2012年5月13日日曜日

Deviated measure

As the first step of counter-measure for the failure in Multi-Plate-Transfer system, I have imagined a most simple way, just removing drive shaft without further treatment in center differential mechanism. No outer mechanical factor would not be applied to half broken MPT if the connection from rear axle rotational movement should be cut off? Of course our legal inspection does not allow such kind of modification in drive train, the removed propeller shaft have to be installed as it should be rotationally every two years.
Basically I don't feel any need for AWD system for my own terms of use, there are more of a disadvantage rather than my another automobiles with 2WD system.
About the use of an AWD automobile in severe condition, in use of muddy and snowy climate, is not so effective, because the tires equipped on the wheels are the most greatest factor, with ordinal radial tires does not play well, so, only specially designed tires are the importance, not AWD system.
Unnecessary mechanical friction resistance loss could not be ignored in AWD mechanical construction, also the weight increased for that exceeds 70kg, exactly equivalents to the weight for one person crew.
It goes without writing here, increase of fuel consumption of AWD system can not be avoided, no way to escape from physics.
All the SUBARU trans-axles equipped with Active Torque Split mechanism must have the same problem of MPT system like that I have experienced, 150,000km span life is just a bit shorter?
Consequently I made up my mind that as a first counter-measure for the inconvenience in MPT, just removing the propeller shaft would be performed. Further use continuing inconvenience in this inconvenient condition should invite the scorch of the intermediate clutch leading to complete destruction.

0 件のコメント:

コメントを投稿