Torsion beam in TypeR

Probably the vehicle with torsion beam rear axle design might not have the construction to adjust rear wheel alignment, because the hinge rubber material would consume the discrepant error and cheat the driver as if it is well adjusted. On the other hand, muddy and sticky dull steering reaction could not be denied, these are the reasons that I don't buy Civic Type R that was modified public car Fit.
It has revealed its true colors representing the poor rear axle construction designing.
However clever lie might be considered by HONDA advertizing division, physical property of torsion beam rear axle could not be fooled until the basic design might be completely changed like TOYOTA did on Brade from Auris.

I'll give it to him, NCP10 TOYOTA Vitz 1300cc RS model with torsion beam rear axle if he wants, because the category is the same as HONDA Fit 1300cc model?
Why must I purchase a dissatisfied automobile at 3,000,000 yen, suppose my profit rate, I have to earn money as much as 15,000,000 to get the amount? Most unlikely dream for him, just unrealistic.

The importance of establishing minimum thrust angle is completely ignored from the beginning if torsion beam designing was invited on rear axle construction. Only a frivolous effort had been made on the design except cost reduction?
Basically any lateral force while turning on the curve situation for an automobile, any lateral rod or alternative arms must be designed, this kind of basic scientific truth and fact should be well understood by an elementary school kid?
Natural Law never tells a lie?

Upper description is not based on the distorted discriminative consideration.