Is it correct that the fact that Japan was attacked by Nuclear weapons is the good reason why Japan does not have Nuclear weapons?
Is it correct to appeal to the world for the abolition of Nuclear weapons because of its misery?
On the contrary, is it helping to secure the absolute status of Nuclear-weapon states by giving fear to non-Nuclear-weapon states?
Japan's Nuclear development capability could be completed in a very short period of time if we want to.
Being able to put it in Orbit means that it can be dropped anywhere, but what about Japan's Rocket and Missile technology?
From the perspective of military power balance, is Japan at the forefront and always at risk of the outbreak of war?
Isn't it wondering from all over the world that Japan, which should be naturally armed with Nuclear weapons, does not do so?
If the United States permits Nuclear weapons, Japan should respond immediately?
That might be the case if Mr. Trump is re-elected, but what will we do?
Regardless of land, sea and air, it is an era of military equipment with unmanned equipment, but it seems that we are doing our best in the progress of Japan.
Japan's missile interception system seems to be advancing, but it may be okay to spend a little more budget.
It seems that the time of peace in the United States, "the Master Hinomaru", has already passed. The times have already changed significantly.
I think it is not the way Japan should be to live smaller while looking at the complexion around us, influenced by the situation in foreign countries.
It's almost time for Japan to awaken from 80 years of hibernation and live seriously.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿