My innate nature of being easily tempted by the Satan bid to a cheap selling price Konica EE Matic Deluxe again at 110 yen then I got it as a matter of fact. Well designed Triplet lens Hexanaon 40 mm/ 2.8 is the purpose to do that. I operated the donor in some different way from the last time. Without changing external appearance as less as possible is the slogan this time. Straight helicoid and Iris value indication and focusing distance scale are alive, but the closest focusing point is formed at 630 mm after adjusting focusing ring stopping position at the limited, 910 mm is the original limitation if any adjusting grinding was not performed. On the other hand, former same 40 mm/2.8 Hexanon could attained 280 mm close up shooting on original helicoid construction. Though all the unnecessary parts were thoroughly removed leading to forming a strange weird shape, all the necessary requirements are satisfied at all with 180 gr weight.
A beauty of function should be produced if it is pursued, but this comparison does not appeal the principle here, how come?
Second trial made almost perfect looks except close up capability, but the lack of specific ability would be compensated by applying close up lens additive in front. Another urgent situation may invite close up barrel ring 10 mm depth fabricated DIY utilizing lens cap and body cap.
On the other hand, we often come across the situation where a little more close up is required, Macro lens can easily reply on such necessity with less performance in more ordinary situations. We are confused when starting for shooting tour what to choose, long lasting internal conflict at all.
Anyway, it looks like some original condition without any modification by an end user living over 70 years later.
As am I keeping another ones in original good lens condition, I might proceed into that direction?
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿